Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) supports the Bible timeframe and descent of all people from Eve.creation.com
New fossil called Ambopteryx likely not bat-winged reptile, but rather species of bird.creation.com
"First, membranous wings are very rare, and occur only in pterosaurs and bats. No intermediate forms have ever been found leading up to these organisms. No half-membranous wing has ever been found. Evolutionists explain only the existence of fully formed membranous wings, but their explanation as to how they arose in the first place is not convincing."Flying squirrels type flight and membranes, have evolved independently half a dozen times in mammals. Is he saying is unconvincing the notion that bats may descend from gliders?
Second, if the evolution of membranous wings were so straightforward, then it is hard to understand why they didn’t evolve more times, since these kinds of wings make flight just as efficient as bird wings. For example, bat wings have even more joints in their hands than humans, giving them fine control during flight. Bats’ many-jointed wings provide for more lift, less drag, and more maneuverability.What's quickly evident when around flying bats is that they are less powerful than birds and can't gain altitude fast.
The Samurai Crab Myth-information about natural selection by Calvin Smith © GILLES MERMET/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY A number of iconic examples have been used over the years to convince people of evolution’s supposed validity.2 Despite them having been s...creation.com
Fraud rediscovered It has long been known that one of the most effective popularizers of evolution fudged some drawings, but only now has the breathtaking extent of his deceit been revealed. by Russell Grigg Most people have heard of or been taught t...creation.com
Feedback archive → Feedback 2019 How could Noah’s Ark have survived the flood? Today’s feedback is from Andrew P. of the United States who has questions about Noah’s Flood. CMI, I have a pressing question about the Flood and how Noah could have survi...creation.com
‘Paleosols’ can form faster than secular scientists think by Michael J. Oard Figure 1. Big Badlands National Park overlook showing horizontal, mostly volcanic and poorly lithified sediments A paleosol is defined as a soil that formed on a landscape i...creation.com
Is the male reproductive system poorly designed? by Jerry Bergman iStockphoto One of the latest proofs of human evolution is the poor design claim, namely that an intelligent Creator would not design some human body part in a certain way. An example ...creation.com
Fiber-optic cables could help secure the US-Mexico border. They can detect people, planes, and cars, tell the difference, and send the exact location.www.businessinsider.com
New York State introduces Molech-honouring law legalizing abortions up to birth by Lita Cosner In ancient Canaan, the inhabitants of the land had a particularly horrific practice of worshiping a false god named Molech by burning their infant children...creation.com
‘It’s not science’ by Don Batten Published: 28 February 2002 (GMT+10) Revised 18 September 2014 Evolutionary teachers often use equivocation to indoctrinate unsuspecting students with the general theory of evolution (GTE). Anti-creationists, such as ...creation.com
Table of Contents Purchase Book Index Foreword & Introduction Chapter 1 Facts & Bias See Study Guide, Lesson 1 Chapter 2 Variation and Natural Selection Versus Evolution See Study Guide, Lesson 2 Chapter 3 The Links Are Missing See Study Guide, Lesso...creation.com
Abortion ‘after birth’? Medical ‘ethicists’ promote infanticide by Jonathan Sarfati stock.xchng: spouliot ‘Ethicists’ say that this baby may be killed. We have often provided evidence for the full humanity of the unborn child right from conception (i...creation.com
Whatever, is it not the case that the majority of the people implied by your "accepted" are themselves evolutionists -- I mean, once discarded the general public whose ignorance is implied by the pragmatics of your communicating? The least that can be said for the critical admitters, in that case, is that they display way more freedom from cognitive dissonance than Creationists do.
Creation -- BTW -- is that not the report written in the third person on the first page of the Bible, of alleged events described as having no witness but the agent?